Lenovo 81FK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81FK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory14.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1616 x 1208 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 22:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 139
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 386
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 38EC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7637
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 6.6
4% 14.6 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 268 260 260 269 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 634
Write 1005
Mixed 740
SusWrite 265
149% 661 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63.9
212% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 252
323% 578 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 140%
Great: 214%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
498GB free
Firmware: JU003E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 94 97 97 97 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 131
Write 135
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 96.4
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FN 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FK Builds (Compare 1,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback