Hp-pavilion KQ493AA-A2L s3530f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion KQ493AA-A2L s3530f  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek Acacia
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080507
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 14:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 52.3
18% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 104
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 9% Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GS
Device(1B0A 900C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1
2% 1.47 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 86 86 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 86.4
Write 84.4
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 84.9
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB
35GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 19.1
Write 16.6
Mixed 14
SusWrite 18.7
23% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 501
8% 501 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback