Samsung RF508/RF408/RF708

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Samsung RF508/RF408/RF708 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RF508/RF408/RF708
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100915
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '21 at 09:42
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 32 2-Core 66.1 40% 57.5 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 152 17% 131 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C08E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 1 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100 8,795 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AC1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 47 41 14 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 48 Write 50 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 34.7 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 47%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 21GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 29 29 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 28 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 28 38% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 84% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5428-001.A00LF 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 11.1 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 8.4 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RF508/RF408/RF708 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF508/RF408/RF708

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	2x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	4x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	2x
99U5428-001.A00LF 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GBUnknownBench 34%, 1 sample	1x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 80AD HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GBUnknownBench 32%, 12 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16