Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory50.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 06:19
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 301
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 912
93% 750 Pts
64-Core 1142
71% 1142 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2670) 2GB
CLim: 1312 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.2% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 45.4
26% 39.4 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 37
35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611110WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,815
Write 4,522
Mixed 3,145
787% 3,494 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 93.7
347% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1559
DQ Write 1,321
DQ Mixed 1,425
1,072% 1435 MB/s
Poor: 280% Great: 578%
Amd-raid Array 2 479GB
443GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 230 212 215 223 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 454
Write 851
Mixed 476
SusWrite 220
113% 500 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 11.9
90% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 199
172% 248 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 162%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
9GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 87 89 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 73.5
Write 47.5
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 88.8
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 83%
Amd-raid Array 3 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 154 156 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 111
Write 102
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 157
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
224% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 94%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 121 118 121 123 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 170
Write 151
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 120
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
345% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF4G72AZ-3G2EZ 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 40.8
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 38.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback