Asrock H81 Pro BTC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81 Pro BTC  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 21:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 179
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 318
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.9.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 78.5
49% 63.8 fps
MRender 55.1
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 42
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 364
Mixed 268
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 36.7
131% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 291
232% 327 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
271GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 76.5
Write 75.3
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 67.7
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81 Pro BTC Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H81 Pro BTC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback