Asus H81M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-R  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140813
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 15:50
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 212
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 399
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 27.9
16% 26.1 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 28
21% 25.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 92 87 82 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 92.8
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 84.1
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
98GB free
Firmware: 3E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 73 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 72.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 72.3
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-R Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback