ADD TO PC
BUILD

Eurocom Shark 7R2

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Eurocom Shark 7R2 (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM Shark 7R2
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '17 at 02:21
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 204 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 549 57% 461 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 3,080 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Clevo(1558 0152) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 36.5 Parallax 31.4 31% 35.2 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 25.8 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 27%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW120H6 120GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSBG100 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 167 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 722 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 50 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 71 103083868211 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 50 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 80018 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 80018 (F2) Unknown 100 100 70784 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1364 (FC) Unknown 100 100 19	87.3% Excellent	Read 503 Write 199 Mixed 351 77% 351 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 38.6 141% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 72.3 106% 198 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 93%
Toshiba MK7559GSXF 750GB 1,514 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 354GB free Firmware: GQ005B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2026 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 15027 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 53 53 18861 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8705 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2251 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 2223 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1070669 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219043725341 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 51 (DE) Loaded hours 72 72 11398 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 214 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 512	31.7% Below average	Read 58.2 Write 52.2 Mixed 66.2 45% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.23 62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 138GB free Firmware: GH2OA420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 220 220 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2613 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1094 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 139913 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 279173595163 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 19 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 358 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	52.4% Above average	Read 91.4 Write 91.1 Mixed 85.3 67% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.19 66% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C11S3L/8G 1315 CT102464BF186D.M16 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1867, 1867 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 20.1 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 21 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback