Acer Aspire M3470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M3470  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3470
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 06:33
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3800 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 75.7
40% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 131
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Acer(1025 061D) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.3.0
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 4.8
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
978GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 14 7.5 1.7 2.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Read 1.8
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 15.8
4% 5.12 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 65%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
192GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 78 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 80.1
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 74%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
676GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 84.5
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 26.4
73% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
163% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 56.9
Write 95.5
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 25.6
80% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 50.6
Write 115
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 27.2
76% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate Portable 5TB
2TB free, PID 2344
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 23.3
Write 24.5
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 30.3
37% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 57%
HP Desktop HD BD07 2TB
1TB free, PID bd07
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 105 109 101 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 87
Write 89.1
Mixed 38
SusWrite 104
107% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 46%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
2TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 92.3
Write 103
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 26.9
90% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 72%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
781GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 102
Write 97.9
Mixed 56
SusWrite 26.9
90% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
725GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 47.9
Write 85.1
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 27.3
74% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 73%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 116
Write 93.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 26.8
90% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1
192% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 HU564403EP0200 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.2
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3470 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M3470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback