Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 04:57
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 114
2-Core 235
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 832
77% 644 Pts
64-Core 1917
119% 1917 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
PNY(196E 1304) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 246
Parallax 173
142% 198 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 152
Splatting 126
125% 157 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 150 176 172 176 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 389
Write 262
Mixed 310
SusWrite 173
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 42.1
144% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 288
207% 266 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 94%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
87GB free
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 143 161 165 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 369
Write 214
Mixed 233
SusWrite 160
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 37
133% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 232
179% 246 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
164GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 205 206 210 212 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 404
Write 303
Mixed 273
SusWrite 207
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 36.6
130% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 149
144% 227 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 970GB
514GB free
Firmware: MCC3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 112 112 113 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 50.8
Write 91.2
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 112
60% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G30C15U4BL.M16FE 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 37.4
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 35.9
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback