Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '21 at 00:34
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 76.2 1-Core 139 2-Core 277 88% 164 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 812 81% 661 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.3% Very good	Lighting 94.4 Reflection 108 Parallax 109 77% 104 fps	MRender 93.8 Gravity 94.7 Splatting 97 78% 95.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 148 52 63 50 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 473 Write 134 Mixed 338 SusWrite 79.5 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 35.1 141% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 153 126% 180 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 750GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 168 169 167 170 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 116 Write 159 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 167 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,178 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 32.7 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.8 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 32.1 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,294x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,429x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,248x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	773x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $850

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16