ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 29249FG

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 29249FG (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 29249FG
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101027
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '21 at 20:51
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 125 53% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 170 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21C1) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msata 256GB SSD 256GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0707B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 186 197 205 205 208 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.9% Average	Read 222 Write 206 Mixed 204 SusWrite 199 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 15.1 62% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 41 63% 117 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905428-010.A00LF 2x2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.1 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback