MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 18:25
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 380
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
MSI(1462 7817) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 116 120 125 126 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 361
Write 146
Mixed 193
SusWrite 124
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 29.7
116% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 140
110% 153 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
108GB free
Firmware: MS1OA650
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 106 106 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 107
67% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 2OZ 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 5,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) - $73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback