Medion MS-7797

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MS-7797  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7797
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 16:20
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 177
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 334
46% 338 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 408 391 273 105 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 463
Write 394
Mixed 382
SusWrite 277
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 24.9
107% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 45.8
93% 184 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
928GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 183 193 186 175 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 110
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 184
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7797 Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7797

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback