Asus Z170-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '17 at 16:16
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 725
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 74.9
48% 65.5 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 55
Splatting 52.4
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 404
Mixed 414
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 25.9
146% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.2
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 24.9
33% 57 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 159
Mixed 150
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.22
184% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 109%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
886GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67% Good
Read 113
Write 120
Mixed 116
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.44
142% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
499GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 81.7
Mixed 88.7
68% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.32
114% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
364GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 99.3
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.23
103% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 107%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 154
Write 146
Mixed 107
170% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.19
93% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 57%
29GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 163
Write 45.1
Mixed 40
82% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.25
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.65
76% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 47%
11GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 42.1
Write 28
Mixed 22.1
36% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.49
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.62
75% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 30.9
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 29.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z170-DELUXE - $319

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,064
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback