HP t620 Quad Core TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP t620 Quad Core TC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21B4
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 08:06
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-415GA SOC HD Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 37.2
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 46.4
23% 35.2 Pts
4-Core 86.1
8-Core 87.3
12% 86.7 Pts
64-Core 86.3
5% 86.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330E
HP(103C 21B4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hfs128g3 AMNB-2200A 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 242 301 222 284 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 381
Write 298
Mixed 254
SusWrite 270
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 20
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 150
112% 149 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 87%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
24GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 85.3
Write 20.1
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 20.2
42% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.6
249% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 216
19% 216 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t620 Quad Core TC Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP t620 Quad Core TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback