MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 08:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 582
77% 578 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1781 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 40.5
32% 41.2 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 41
Splatting 29.8
29% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 312 302 301 302 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 317
Mixed 317
SusWrite 303
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 45.8
184% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 250
214% 316 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Seagate NAS HDD 3TB-$119
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 171 172 171 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 170
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
450GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 128
Write 114
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 112
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 76%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
165GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 95.9
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 95.2
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905665-023.A00G 04CB 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback