HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory1.4 GB free of 3.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090819
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5504
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 50.2
2-Core 100
49% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 199
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 72.6
41% 60.8 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 56.1
Splatting 44.6
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 232 227 237 238 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66% Good
Read 226
Write 236
Mixed 222
SusWrite 232
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 33.8
109% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 196
147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7BFR8C-H9 37GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback