Lenovo 20251

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20251  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO G700
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130422
Uptime94.9 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 64
2-Core 74
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 181
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Legend(17AA 3910) 1GB
Driver: Ver. 9.18.13.2723
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.2
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM128E 121GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM09A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 188 185 188 193 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 372
Write 190
Mixed 222
SusWrite 187
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 16.9
58% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 68.1
DQ Mixed 121
100% 148 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3020EC58E9F1333 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20251 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20251

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback