Acer Aspire 1825PTZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 1825PTZ  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM12-MS-CAP
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 21:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U4100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 18.6
2-Core 35.6
28% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 34.1
8-Core 37
5% 35.5 Pts
64-Core 36
2% 36 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0300)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.4
1% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 21 15 7 7.7 9.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 55.7
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 14.6
29% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1825PTZ Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire 1825PTZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback