Novatech PC-1761D

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Novatech PC-1761D (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z87-HD3
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '20 at 14:59
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.35 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Memory 5.77 1-Core 8.1 2-Core 16.3 6% 10.1 Pts	4-Core 30.4 8-Core 40.4 4% 35.4 Pts	64-Core 44.5 3% 44.5 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 3061) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 22.5 Parallax 31.3 13% 23.1 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 29.1 Splatting 24.5 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.7 0.5 1.6 2.5 3.1 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 361 Write 6 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 1.7 20% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.6 95% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 78 97 73 77 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 169 Write 145 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 89.5 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 100%
WD WD10EZEX-00BN5A0 (TurboPC EX) 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 715GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 31 27 26 17 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 176 Write 20.5 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 22.8 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 102%
WD 10EACS External 1TB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 282GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 20 23 19 20 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 36.6 Mixed 29.4 SusWrite 21.8 41% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 2x8GB 905 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 8.4 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.8 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 445 9% 445 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16