Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 815
86% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3994 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 109
Parallax 119
100% 117 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 109
Splatting 98.4
96% 121 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 361 353 350 351 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 477
Mixed 437
SusWrite 351
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 60.4
202% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 267
229% 338 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
284GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 130 177 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 76
SusWrite 134
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 208 208 211 210 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 159
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 208
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
732GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 130 129 126 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 132
Write 106
Mixed 73
SusWrite 127
145% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
4GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 36
Mixed 31
SusWrite 37.2
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 32.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M GAMING Builds (Compare 1,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback