Intel E5 M2L-8D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardIntel E5 M2L-8D  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 05:09
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 59.7
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 177
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 691
62% 521 Pts
64-Core 1,775
110% 1,775 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 93.4
51% 73.6 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 46.8
48% 60 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T170810d
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 111 429 429 388 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 449
Write 22.7
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 360
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 22.9
97% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 122
97% 136 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 98%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
25GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 10 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 16.7
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 11
22% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
15% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5 M2L-8D Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Intel E5 M2L-8D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback