Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '17 at 06:58
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 724 74% 597 Pts	64-Core 720 44% 720 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371D) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Lighting 79.2 Reflection 78.4 Parallax 68.3 64% 75.3 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 74.1 Splatting 70.9 59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 75482082 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -94935957104773 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 823 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 153 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 45 77312360482 (C2) HDA temperature 34 45 77312360482 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 75482082 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 75482082 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 75482082 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 38654705665 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9958 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6905 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6905 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5475 (F4) Unknown 98 98 4915268	67.8% Good	Read 506 Write 158 Mixed 238 66% 301 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 14.7 118% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 13.2 34% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 146 146 21490434329 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2802 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5991 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 807 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 7186 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 7186 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 171800002593 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	98.5% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 174 Mixed 159 126% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.22 104% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 108%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 232GB free Firmware: 2BA30010 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 6 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 89 3563 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2719 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2798 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 42 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1047 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 16 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 58 188979871776 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 19484 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 42 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 22721	49.5% Average	Read 88.4 Write 84 Mixed 89.6 66% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.38 96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 15,285 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 31 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 40.7 SC Mixed 30.2 87% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	477x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	79x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $901

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16