Acer TravelMate 2420

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate 2420  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Garda-910
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20060523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 20:23
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 99%
CPU Throttled 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.80GHz
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 49.1
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 9.7
20% 23.4 Pts
4-Core 10.3
8-Core 9.7
1% 10 Pts
64-Core 10.4
1% 10.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD600VE-75HDT1 60GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.07D11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 27 27 25 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 27.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 23.9
19% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.3
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback