Supermicro C7P67

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro C7P67 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro C7P67
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120423
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '20 at 17:51
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 365 50% 370 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52% Above average	Lighting 67.6 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 97.8 55% 77.3 fps	MRender 59.9 Gravity 74.6 Splatting 40.3 46% 58.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 337GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 63 63 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 351 Write 98.6 Mixed 148 SusWrite 62.7 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 30.9 101% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 97.6 DQ Mixed 124 97% 137 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 129%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB 12,396 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 931GB free Firmware: 401100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 64 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 349 Write 99.8 Mixed 146 SusWrite 63.3 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 28.6 94% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 93.2 DQ Mixed 124 96% 135 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 118%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45 23,554 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 298GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 106 108 108 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 111 Write 93 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 106 68% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-669.A00LF 4x4GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.6 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.5 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C7P67 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7P67

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	4x
Core i7-2600Intel $169Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	3x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	2x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	1x

SSD
Q Series Pro 128GBToshiba $66Bench 82%, 2,808 samples	1x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 24GBCorsairBench 35%, 3 samples	3x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	1x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16