Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 62.9 2-Core 109 54% 84.9 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 161 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M 5,654 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 16F2) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.4 2% 1.8 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60 12,460 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 458GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,788 Write 20.2 Mixed 27.4 676% 945 MB/s	4K Read 324 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.5 13,799% 109 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01G 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 43%, 129 samples	2x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	2x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188