Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 06:09
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 705
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 108
Parallax 98.8
85% 104 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 84.9
82% 103 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 486 420 343 345 346 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 488
Mixed 420
SusWrite 403
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.3
226% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 66.2
124% 248 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 131%
Great: 126%
GIGABYTE 240GB
6GB free
Firmware: SBFM
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 402
Mixed 342
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 32.3
139% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 32.5
84% 174 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 89%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 157
Write 147
Mixed 100
SusWrite 119
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
108GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 110 111 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 109
Write 98.7
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 110
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback