Gigabyte GA-Z490 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory42.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 00:24
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 160
2-Core 315
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,245
110% 936 Pts
64-Core 2,151
133% 2,151 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Asus(1043 878E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 124
Parallax 108
92% 115 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 91
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
717GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1707 1553 1462 1466 1478 1455 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,566
Write 2,401
Mixed 1,822
SusWrite 1,520
466% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 85.8
281% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 948
710% 945 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 325%
Great: 410%
WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 193
Write 194
Mixed 103
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.5
10% 4.53 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 4.7
DQ Mixed 2.7
2% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 23%
WD WD101EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 199
Write 209
Mixed 112
128% 173 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.6
400% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 119%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$145
6.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 198
Write 200
Mixed 107
125% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.5
392% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD WD101EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 189
Mixed 112
120% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.3
345% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.7
Write 126
Mixed 72
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
261% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 147
Mixed 90.8
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
631% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 87.7
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
321% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 24TB
18TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 354
Write 359
Mixed 238
398% 317 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.7
274% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 29.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 31.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 GAMING X Builds (Compare 2,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $862
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback