MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 17:39
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 828
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 305
Parallax 214
176% 245 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 237
Splatting 178
182% 228 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,197
Write 1,452
Mixed 1236
360% 1,628 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 73
254% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 829
598% 781 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 463GB
199GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 527 541 551 534 487 489 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,101
Write 163
Mixed 201
SusWrite 522
108% 497 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 20.8
77% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 142
144% 242 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 112%
Great: 135%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 537GB
497GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 29 31 33 40 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1412
Write 637
Mixed 361
SusWrite 34.4
133% 611 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 26.8
98% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 124
144% 259 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
692GB free
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 109
63% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
716GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 76 100 144 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 161
Write 28.2
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 102
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2800 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 2800 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 39.7
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback