Acer TravelMate 5740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate 5740  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate 5740
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100507
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 97.9
40% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 132
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 036D) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 164 192 190 194 94 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 215
Write 198
Mixed 188
SusWrite 171
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.4
57% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 169
125% 164 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
449GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 102 109 107 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 106
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 8.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate 5740 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate 5740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback