HP Mini 110-3100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Mini 110-3100  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 148A
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N455
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 43.7
1-Core 7.3
2-Core 11.9
18% 21 Pts
4-Core 12
8-Core 12
2% 12 Pts
64-Core 11.9
1% 11.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 217
Write 104
Mixed 138
SusWrite 107
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 16.9
55% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 44.3
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 37.6
29% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5295-011.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
8.87% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.83 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback