HP Pavilion 590-p0086 Desktop Rfrbd PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 590-p0086 Desktop Rfrbd PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 15:34
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 244
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 755
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.3% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 69.4
57% 69.3 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 55.9
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT240BX200SSD1 480GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 132 58 94 37 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 420
Write 145
Mixed 220
SusWrite 82.3
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
3% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 22.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 23.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 590-p0086 Desktop Rfrbd PC Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 590-p0086 Desktop Rfrbd PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback