Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2500 APU 2,593 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 35.5 1-Core 5.1 2-Core 13.8 15% 18.1 Pts	4-Core 9.8 8-Core 8.9 1% 9.35 Pts	64-Core 5.7 0% 5.7 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0782) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.33% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 1.9 1% 2 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.33% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 247GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 61 52 68 68 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 21.4 Write 32.2 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 61 23% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 28% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G 6GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	3.23% Terrible	MC Read 0.7 MC Write 1.1 MC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.8 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.2 GB/s	Latency 224 18% 224 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	8x
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	8x
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	3x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 47%, 2,211 samples	6x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	1x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16