Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$75 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 156 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 221 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 420 437 435 442 436 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 408 Write 388 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 366 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 11.9 58% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.4 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 18.2 15% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 851GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 162 181 168 182 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 166 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 175 96% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston KP223C-ELD Kingston KP223C-ELD 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.5 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	54x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	22x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	18x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 88 samples	9x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 PSD34G1600L81 PSD34G1600L81 12GBSamsungBench 37%, 7 samples	5x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $298