Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '20 at 03:49
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 124 57% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 209 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3202) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 40.8 35% 43.2 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 35.7 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 82 46 129 36 38 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 432 Write 333 Mixed 334 SusWrite 106 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 27.3 123% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 7.2 DQ Mixed 0.5 28% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 19GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 111 117 108 113 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 122 Write 125 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 114 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 77%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 874GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 176 175 175 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 169 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 174 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX2400C11D3/4GX 8GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.6 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 11.9 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	9x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	8x
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples	3x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
SSD 128GBSanDisk $84Bench 41%, 8,513 samples	1x

RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 42%, 629 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 8,818 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $148

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16