Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 16:30
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 99
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 473
53% 417 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 91
Parallax 85.5
76% 89.8 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 73.4
72% 90.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 669 745 833 833 854 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,135
Write 1,069
Mixed 1,074
SusWrite 705
224% 996 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 49.8
182% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 689
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 639
476% 633 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 172%
Great: 347%
Kingchuxing 120GB 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: 906XKR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 359
Mixed 268
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 12.4
90% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 67.8
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 17
64% 133 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
20GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 308 314 316 317 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 488
Write 315
Mixed 307
SusWrite 280
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 29
109% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 186
170% 259 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83%
Great: 115%
Kingchuxing 128GB 128GB
47GB free
Firmware: 906XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 141 107 9.6 15 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 332
Write 141
Mixed 152
SusWrite 61.6
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 8.7
64% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 57.1
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 0.6
27% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
15GB free
Firmware: 3.ALC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 27
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 25.1
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 24%
Generic USB SD Reader 1GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 0080 Elpida AM2L16BC8R2-B0QS 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback