Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 14:56
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4860HQ
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 619
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.1% Average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 84.7
51% 69.7 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 64
Splatting 45.4
45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Morebeck-v602 240GB 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 163 40 11 52 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 435
Write 377
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 64.4
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.2
31% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
46GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 101 86 94 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 83.2
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 116
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 9.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 22.8
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback