Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory42.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 07:04
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 826
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 87.1
52% 71.6 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 46.6
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: LSF042C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 118 121 114 145 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 491
Write 390
Mixed 376
SusWrite 165
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 40.9
139% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 174
136% 188 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 96%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
149GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 251 253 251 253 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 442
Mixed 257
SusWrite 256
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 47.4
166% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 172
138% 194 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 111%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
58GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 352 369 350 349 335 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 451
Mixed 438
SusWrite 363
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 58.9
196% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148
166GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 440 439 438 438 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 446
Mixed 361
SusWrite 438
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 40.7
145% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 152
129% 189 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
SABRENT 1TB
583GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1752 891 922 886 923 891 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
1.5TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 136 140 135 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 146
Write 160
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 136
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 120%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 174 176 177 178 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 142
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 175
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 M378A2K43DB1-CTD Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 29.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 29.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback