Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 02:17
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 169
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 635
57% 483 Pts
64-Core 1,610
100% 1,610 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 188
Parallax 177
134% 176 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 178
Splatting 123
116% 144 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 122%
Great: 140%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 434 425 442 421 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 444
Mixed 372
SusWrite 435
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 31.5
104% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 321
241% 323 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-CK 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 35.8
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback