Asrock M3A780GXH/128M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock M3A780GXH/128M  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 00:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 97.1
46% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 176
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 74.8
49% 67.5 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 40.5
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS064GE4BBDC 64GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z1000001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 18 4 4.1 9.8 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 77
Write 23.3
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 11.5
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 4.8
846% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 38%
Maxtor 6B200P0 204GB
128GB free
Firmware: BAH41B10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 53
Write 57.5
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 56.5
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
145% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
400, 400, 400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A780GXH/128M Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock M3A780GXH/128M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $868
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback