Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 586
57% 468 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 398 393 393 365 332 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 423
Mixed 256
SusWrite 373
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 37.9
138% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 296
243% 346 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 119%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
109GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 124 122 123 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 170
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 140
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2
356% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 33.2
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback