Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 20:42
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 188
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 840
81% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,963
122% 1,963 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
183% Outstanding
Lighting 266
Reflection 231
Parallax 297
217% 265 fps
MRender 291
Gravity 220
Splatting 163
177% 225 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 183%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 440 442 405 310 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 434
Mixed 367
SusWrite 410
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 42.8
148% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 191
142% 188 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
164GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 445 452 423 362 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 410
Mixed 423
SusWrite 406
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 44.6
164% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
796GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 445 452 423 341 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 441
Mixed 416
SusWrite 425
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 56.8
179% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$180
492GB free
Firmware: SS0411B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2227 920 957 1258 1254 1264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,972
Write 1,339
Mixed 951
SusWrite 1,313
311% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 52.1
201% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 1,164
DQ Mixed 585
555% 853 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 264%
Great: 379%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
416GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 164 154 150 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 127
Write 111
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 159
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 6TB
3TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 203 221 205 178 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 243
Write 177
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 198
212% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$129
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 37.7
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 35.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback