Gigabyte GA-Z490I AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490I AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 05:18
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 156
2-Core 298
102% 184 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,086
99% 831 Pts
64-Core 2097
130% 2097 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 3883) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
175% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 204
Parallax 243
210% 235 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 199
Splatting 150
162% 206 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 175%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,442
Write 2,222
Mixed 1,438
452% 2,034 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 81.9
276% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 67.1
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 93
80% 113 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 247%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 250GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2348 2375 2381 1878 1574 1583 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 2,361
Mixed 1757
SusWrite 2,023
486% 2,160 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 84.3
278% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 68.1
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 94.1
79% 112 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 316%
Great: 405%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 29.1
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 31.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 46.4
86% 46.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490I AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490I AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $814
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback