| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P5KR (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 19 '17 at 14:32 |
| Run Duration | 102 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.3%
Average
|
41% 62.2 Pts
|
19% 143 Pts
|
9% 141 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1744 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
13.4%
Very poor
|
3% 32.4 fps
|
34% 42 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
52.2%
Above average
|
50% 227 MB/s
|
93% 30.6 MB/s
|
19% 31.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
20.8%
Poor
|
19% 6.63 GB/s
|
16% 5.73 GB/s
|
41% 97.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5KR Builds (Compare 19 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5KR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 2x |
| GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $299 |