Dell XPS 630i

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 630i  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0PP150
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 01:46
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8300
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 103
50% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 105
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Sapphire(174B 1071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 177
Parallax 108
86% 130 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 107
Splatting 106
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 65 76 81 78 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 85.2
Write 84.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 69.3
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 5.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 630i Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 630i

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback