HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc5800 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2820h
Memory2.4 GB free of 3.50391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '15 at 19:18
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E1200
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 39.4
13% 28.9 Pts
4-Core 39
8-Core 38
5% 38.5 Pts
64-Core 39
2% 39 Pts
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 0847) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4181
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.32 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 50.3
Mixed 31
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.29
65% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG SP0802N 80GB
69GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 13.7
28% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.4
53% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 16%
Typical Compaq dc5800 Microtower Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback