Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 498
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 37.8
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27.2
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 318 315 312 314 318 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD WD1200JB-00EVA0 120GB
63GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 36 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 35.2
Write 39.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 35.9
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 32%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
138GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 36 35 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 64
Write 61.7
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 35.9
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%
Lacie d2Next-Quadra 1TB
641GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 101 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 125
Write 119
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 100
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 30.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback