Asus Z240IC-H170-GTX950

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus Z240IC-H170-GTX950 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z240IC-H170-GTX950
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160307
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	May 18 '17 at 23:07
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700T 9,225 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1151p, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 38.3 1-Core 73.2 2-Core 54.6 36% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 78.5 8-Core 80.2 11% 79.3 Pts	64-Core 88.2 6% 88.2 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Intel(8086 1912) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.48% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 6.41 6% 8.6 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 6.07 Splatting 14.3 8% 9.11 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDTR500GB 500GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 413GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1126A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 336 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 87 (A3) Unknown 100 100 27 (A4) Unknown 100 100 2691 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 2 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 3 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 38917 (F2) Unknown 100 100 40067 (F5) Unknown 100 100 21528	57.3% Above average	Read 449 Write 257 Mixed 269 72% 325 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 14.5 75% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 38.8 DQ Mixed 11.8 15% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 103%
Apricorn SATAWire 512GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 203GB free, PID 0040 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 42.8 Write 42.9 Mixed 42.7 55% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 7.81 978% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 7.77 978% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GB 13,778 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 210 19% 210 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16