HP 24-b277na

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 24-b277na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82DC
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '17 at 21:52
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 225
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 615
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82DC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.93
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 7.78
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 16.3
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 172
Mixed 171
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS545025B9SA02 250GB
168GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
29% Poor
Read 66.9
Write 70.9
Mixed 21.1
64% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.26
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29%
Great: 35%
KINGSTON SV300S37A240G 240GB
93GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 30.3
Write 31.5
Mixed 31.3
40% 31 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 8.41
893% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 8.2
1,090% 15 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24-b277na Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 24-b277na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback