Asus BU203UAV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus BU203UAV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BU203UAV
Memory11.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160629
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateMay 18 '17 at 20:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 130
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 221
34% 245 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1170) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 6.09
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 13.2
7% 7.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512G39MND-3510A 512GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20400P00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 499
Write 335
Mixed 456
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 14.7
94% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 41.6
64% 114 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback